[ad_1]
As yearly throughout our annual Fluoride Consciousness Week, Fluoride Motion Community (FAN) founder Dr. Paul Connett is right here to offer us with a progress replace. FAN has been instrumental in decreasing fluoride publicity in North America and in lots of nations all through the world over the previous 20 years.
As in earlier years, we ask that you think about donating to this worthy group that’s spearheading the daunting activity of eliminating water fluoridation world wide. As traditional, Mercola.com will match your donation, greenback for greenback, as much as $25,000 throughout Fluoride Consciousness Week.
Fluoride Lowers Kids’s IQ
From the very starting, certainly one of Connett’s driving issues was the chance that fluoride may be reducing youngsters’s IQ.
“Two Chinese language research had been printed in 1995 and 1996, in English. I was very involved, and felt strongly that if there was any proof that fluoride lowered intelligence of youngsters, then there is no approach you’ll put advantages to enamel above that and proceed water fluoridation,” Connett says.
Ten years later, in 2006, the Nationwide Analysis Council appeared on the toxicology of fluoride.1 At the moment, there have been six IQ research and, primarily based on these six research together with many animal research, the NRC concluded that fluoride did in truth pose a menace to the mind. By 2008, there have been 18 such research.
In 2012, a distinguished crew, partly from Harvard College, did a overview2 of 27 IQ research; 25 from China and two from Iran. Strikingly, 26 of the research confirmed youngsters with increased fluoride publicity had decrease IQ than the kids with decrease fluoride publicity.
“The bombshell got here in 2017. As much as that time, we had about 60 research that had proven a reducing of IQ, most of them from China, but additionally some from India, some from Iran, some from Mexico,” Connett says.
US-Funded Research Confirms A long time’ Lengthy Suspicions
The bombshell research3,4 Connett refers to, generally known as the “Bashash research” (named after the lead creator, Morteza Bashash, Ph.D.), was funded by the Nationwide Institutes of Well being, the Nationwide Institute of Environmental Well being Sciences and the Environmental Safety Company.
It adopted pregnant girls and their infants for 12 years. They measured the fluoride of their urine, which reveals whole publicity, whatever the supply or sources, they usually discovered a powerful relationship between the fluoride stage in moms’ urine and IQ scores of their youngsters on the ages of 4, and between 6 and 12.
It’s vital to understand that it’s not the focus of fluoride within the water (measured in mg per liter) that is important for well being. What issues is the dose you get in milligrams per day, and the dosage (mg/day divided by the person’s physique weight), and these rely upon a wide range of fluctuating elements.
“The NIH is a guardian of the Public Well being Service, so they have been selling fluoride for years and years (since 1950). So, I consider they put some huge cash into this research pondering that it could show, as soon as and for all, that loopy folks like me and others had been completely fallacious in regards to the notion that fluoride lowers IQ in youngsters.
However lo and behold, they gave us very, very robust proof that it is. And that essentially the most inclined age, so far as fluoride’s impression on the mind, is throughout fetal growth.
It seems the placenta doesn’t shield the fetus from fluoride, and, as , as much as about six months of age, the blood-brain barrier will not be absolutely shaped within the child. So, the fetus could be very inclined to this impression of fluoride.”
The primary response of the American Dental Affiliation was that the findings didn’t apply to the US, because it was finished in Mexico Metropolis. Nonetheless, this ignored the truth that human beings are human beings, by measuring fluoride within the urine they’d a measure of whole publicity, whatever the supply. It actually doesn’t matter if the fluoride comes from water, different drinks, meals or toothpaste.
Canadian Researchers Affirm ‘Bombshell’ Outcomes
In 2019, the NIH research was replicated in Canada,5 they usually too discovered that increased fluoride ranges in maternal urine had been related to decrease IQ of their offspring. The one main distinction was that primarily based on maternal urine ranges solely boys seemed to be affected, not the ladies. However when the moms’ fluoride publicity was calculated from ingestion (i.e. from meals and drinks) there was a relationship between that and the kids’s IQ for each girls and boys,
“Now, this research, in contrast to the primary one, the Bashash research, bought a certain quantity of protection,” Connett says. “[It] was printed within the journal of the American Medical Affiliation, Pediatrics. That is one of many main pediatrics journals on the earth, and the editors of this journal went to excessive lengths.
They knew this was controversial. Hats off for them to take it on. They knew it was going to be consequential, in order that they doubled up on the peer overview course of, they double checked the statistics, in order that they had been assured once they launched it. They even ran an editorial saying the steps they’d taken.
That they had two of their editors, the editor of JAMA in whole and the editor of JAMA Pediatrics did a 20-minute podcast explaining how astounding the outcomes had been. They mentioned, ‘Oh, we had no concept that fluoride precipitated any issues to well being.’ I do not know what they’d been studying. However anyway … it was a bombshell for them to all of the sudden discover that fluoride could possibly be damaging the mind of the fetus.
Additionally they ran an editorial from David Bellinger, one of many world’s consultants on lead’s neurotoxicity, and he mentioned ‘The measurements listed below are akin to what’s occurring with lead.’ In different phrases, it’s very, very severe, and that bought a lot of protection world wide.
However the different aspect was organized they usually rapidly bought some ‘consultants’ — none of them really consultants on fluoride or toxicology or neurotoxicity — who mentioned all the best issues to dampen folks’s concern about this research.”
Two Different Necessary Research
“There are 4 research that individuals must learn about,” Connett says. To be taught extra about every, see Connett’s video commentaries on FluorideALERT.org FAN.television web page. Except for the 2 already talked about, the 2 different ones are:
- The Riddell research, printed in 2019, discovered a virtually 300% enhance in ADHD prevalence in adolescents in Canadian communities with fluoridated water provides, in comparison with these residing in non-fluoridated communities. “Science by no means stops,” Connett says. “You’ve got to entertain the notion that an unsightly truth can destroy a lovely idea, on this specific case, we bought numerous ugly info, however the large one is the truth that fluoride might injury youngsters’s brains.”
- The Until research, which in contrast the IQ of youngsters who had been bottle fed as infants in fluoridated communities (and thus would have gotten fluoridated water of their method) versus non-fluoridated communities. Right here, they discovered a big IQ distinction.
FAN Lawsuit Towards EPA on Fluoride Underway
November 22, 2016, a coalition together with FAN, Meals & Water Watch, Natural Customers Affiliation, American Academy of Environmental Medication, Worldwide Academy of Oral Medication and Toxicology, Mothers Towards Fluoridation and several other people, filed a petition6,7 calling on the EPA to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridating chemical compounds to U.S. ingesting water beneath Part 21 of the Poisonous Substances Management Act (TSCA).
As defined by Connett, the TSCA permits residents and nongovernmental organizations to petition the EPA to take away poisonous substances discovered to pose a menace (an unreasonable threat) both to the final inhabitants or a subset of that inhabitants.
The petition was made on the grounds that a big physique of analysis demonstrates fluoride is neurotoxic at doses inside the vary now seen in fluoridated communities, and included over 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing these well being dangers.
The EPA denied the petition8 February 27, 2017, on the grounds that it had did not current “a scientifically defensible foundation” to conclude that anybody had in truth suffered neurotoxic hurt because of fluoride publicity. In response, FAN and its coalition companions filed a lawsuit within the U.S. District Courtroom for the Northern District of California, legally difficult the EPA’s denial of their petition.
This interview was taped June 2, 2020. FAN was scheduled to start arguments in entrance of a decide June 8. FAN will clarify the neurotoxicity of fluoride proven in these and different research, and then the EPA’s business consultants, paid consultants who’ve additionally defended glyphosate and different toxins, will current their proof. (see FAN’s website FluorideAlert.org for a abstract of the trial)
“However now we have, for our lawsuit … some of the main consultants on neurotoxicity on the earth,” Connett says, “together with a pair that had been concerned within the research I have been speaking about.” That consists of Bruce Lanphear, the EPA’s go-to individual for details about the neurotoxicity of lead. Lanphear labored with Until on the JAMA Pediatrics article and the bottle feeding research listed above. Howard Hu, lead creator of the Bashash research, is one other knowledgeable FAN witness, as is Philippe Grandjean.
“I’m very optimistic. [The EPA] doesn’t have the science. We do. And never solely do now we have the science, however now we have among the world’s greatest consultants testifying for us. So, until these artful legal professionals for the EPA are in a position to muddy the waters, I feel we’ll don’t have any hassle in demonstrating three issues: One, that the preponderance of proof that fluoride is neurotoxic is overwhelming.
Second, that it’s a threat on the ranges at which we add fluoride to the water. And thirdly, it is an unreasonable threat. As a result of even when your primary focus was decreasing tooth decay, there are different methods of delivering fluoride, as an alternative of this ridiculous notion of placing it within the ingesting water and forcing it on your entire inhabitants.
I feel we are able to reveal these three issues. And I am pleased to inform you that my son, who began our webpage in 2000 and developed the biggest well being database on the earth, larger than different fluoridating governments, by the best way, goes to be the lawyer combating this case,” Connett says.
Now you can view the transcript of Michael Connett’s sensible abstract assertion
The Finish of Water Fluoridation Is Inevitable
If victorious, the EPA will possible enchantment, as it is a basic stall tactic. “There is no company within the United States that’s higher at dragging its toes on controversial points,” Connett says.
“They dragged their toes for over 18 years on the reassessment of dioxin, a problem I used to be very near, they usually nonetheless did not resolve the problem. They’re very topic to business stress, and their approach of resolving points is simply delay, delay, delay.
However, I do consider that if a federal courtroom, having heard each sides, declares that fluoride poses an pointless threat, an unreasonable threat to the creating mind of our kids, that that information will ricochet round the fluoridating world — Australia, New Zealand, Eire, Canada, Israel, Malaysia, and some different nations the place they nonetheless fluoridate. It may have a huge effect.
And I feel the residents will have the ability to use this as ammunition to say to their well being departments, ‘Come on. Why are you doing this? Why are you doing this once you’ve bought this scientific data … finished by prime notch scientists. Why on earth would you proceed this observe when that if you need fluoride, you’ll be able to merely brush it in your enamel and spit it out. What is your rationale for persevering with this?
By the identical token, to the skilled our bodies, to the AMA, the ADA, the APHA and all these different organizations which have endorsed fluoridation for years and years and years, why would you proceed to help this? Why would you divulge to the general public that you don’t have any scientific credibility?
That you do not learn the science, that you do not sustain with the science on a problem like this? When you are going to the general public and saying once more and many times that fluoridation is protected and efficient, once you’ve bought this proof proper there in entrance of you?
Another factor … Presumably an important company for reviewing the toxicology of poisonous substances is the Nationwide Toxicology Program (NTP). Again in 2016, FAN requested the NTP to do a scientific overview of the neurotoxicity of fluoride. This was earlier than the courtroom case and earlier than we went to courtroom.
After three and a half years they got here again, having reviewed all the animal knowledge and the human knowledge, and of their draft they mentioned, ‘Primarily based upon the literature, the presumption is that fluoride is a neurotoxic substance. Primarily based upon research finished on youngsters in a number of totally different nations, the presumption is that it’s neurotoxic.’
Not that it is particular; however you would need to presume, primarily based upon all of the literature, that it is a neurotoxic substance. So, that’s an enormous vindication for our case. However, as a result of it is a draft and never a remaining model, we won’t really use it within the courtroom case. Nonetheless, that is very helpful for us going ahead, along with regardless of the courtroom guidelines.”
Ending Water Fluoridation Nonetheless Met With Sturdy Resistance
Whereas FAN has efficiently ended water fluoridation in lots of areas, it’s nonetheless very troublesome. One of many causes for it’s because those that need it to proceed at all times level to evaluations by authorities businesses “which, as bogus as they’re and unscientific as they’re, carry numerous weight,” Connett says.
In Eire, they consult with the knowledgeable committee. In New Zealand, they consult with the ministry of well being and in Australia to the Nationwide Well being and Medical Analysis Council. Within the United States, they consult with the Facilities of Illness Management and Prevention.
All of these businesses have promoted water fluoridation and aren’t good judges of whether or not there are issues or not. Hopefully, a courtroom win towards the EPA will facilitate and velocity up the method of getting fluoride out of ingesting water. A win would additionally set one other vital precedent:
“We have been in a position to convey this to courtroom beneath the Poisonous Substances and Management Act, which has a clause [stating] that any group or particular person can petition the EPA to take away, to ban, any specific use of a selected chemical in the US if they will present it is an unreasonable threat to the inhabitants, or perhaps a subset of the inhabitants.
We … together with Meals & Water Watch are the primary teams to ever do that. So, it is establishing a vital precedent, which is de facto worrying the chemical business. It’s an enormous concern of ours, as a result of behind the scenes I am certain they’re attempting to muddy the waters in each approach they will. However it is an enormous precedent. I hope that our victory can even shoot adrenaline into the veins of all these different [health safety] teams …”
One other Fluoride-Associated Situation To Be Tackled
In our interview, Connett additionally discusses the fluoride air pollution launched throughout recycling of lithium ion batteries, corresponding to these utilized in electrical vehicles. Lithium ion batteries comprise fluorinated polymers like polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) and an electrolyte known as lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6).
When heated through the recycling course of, these fluorinated compounds break down to provide hydrogen fluoride, and plenty of fluorinated byproducts that are poisonous and troublesome to seize. Like PFOS, these chemical compounds stick round for thus lengthy they’re generally known as “perpetually chemical compounds.”
Because it occurs, a lithium ion battery incinerator is being constructed close to Connett’s house, throughout the street from a residential space and adjoining to a bit league baseball subject. “It’s a fully insane, unethical siting,” Connett says, noting that there actually isn’t any protected place for such services. It’s the recycling course of itself that must be modified, which is what Connett is combating for now.
“What this has finished is fortuitous. It has introduced collectively almost all of the strands of our activism. I’ve had 35 years combating incineration and dioxins [and] 24 years combating fluoridation. Now we’re assembly hydrogen fluoride and fluorinated by-products in spades. On the very least the issue might be: What do you do with the sodium fluoride that is left over within the effluent, the waste water?
I hope somebody doesn’t mean placing it within the ingesting water. As a result of additionally in that waste water you will have a PFAS, a polyfluorinated alkyl substance (utilized in among the batteries), and my spouse has spent many, a few years sustaining a database on these PFAS … She’s been involved with that for a very long time. So, we have been in a position to attract on three totally different strands of our activism to assist our local people.”
Keep away from Fluoride to Optimize Your Well being
Eliminating water fluoridation will go a good distance towards defending the well being of all folks, however particularly youngsters. Sacrificing youngsters’s mind operate for a theoretical good thing about much less tooth decay is unconscionable.
Except for ensuring you don’t drink fluoridated water, or use fluoridated water to combine toddler method, to cut back your publicity, keep away from ingesting extreme quantities of tea, which tends to be excessive in fluoride.
“Combine it up,” Connett says. “If you happen to should drink tea, then drink tea, drink espresso, drink natural tea. Combine it round. Not an excessive amount of tea. Additionally, keep away from animal bones. Do not eat the bones from sardines and pilchards. Do not eat the bones from rooster. Keep away from mechanically deboned meat.”
Name to Motion — Donate As we speak!
Once more, for extra particulars on the 4 research Connett highlights on this interview, see his video commentaries on FAN.television web page. There you too can discover a webinar lecture by FAN’s senior scientist, Chris Neurath, wherein he explains the neurotoxicity of fluoride. To assist unfold the phrase, you’ll be able to print out a FAN pamphlet to share with household, pals and local people bulletin boards.
In closing, in case you’re involved in regards to the well being results of fluoride, please help FAN along with your tax-deductible donation right now. Mercola.com will match your donation, greenback for greenback, up to $25,000 throughout Fluoride Consciousness Week.
[ad_2]
Leave a Reply